
50
The War We
Wage
(Eph.
6:10-12)
Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.
Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
We now
enter the seventh and final major section of the latter half of Paul’s Epistle
to the Ephesians (chs. 4-6). Thus far we have seen that there are six things
involved in our “Walk In Christ.” We come now to the seventh, Walk In
Victory (6:10-20).
|
THE DUTY |
THE DOCTRINE |
|
Walk in unity (4:1‑16) |
1:22-23; 2:16,21-22; 3:6 |
|
Walk in purity (4:17‑32) |
1:4 |
|
Walk in love (5:1‑7) |
3:17-19 |
|
Walk in light (5:8‑14) |
1:18 |
|
Walk in wisdom (5:15‑17) |
1:8,17; 3:10 |
|
Walk in submission (5:18‑6:9) |
3:8 |
|
Walk in
victory (6:10‑20) |
1:19-21 |
As with
each of the subjects in these chapters, we see here that the duty is
based on the doctrine of chapters 1-3. The doctrine on which this
section is based appears in 1:19-21, where Paul prays that Believers might
know “the exceeding greatness of [God’s] power,” the same power, in fact, that
“raised [Christ] from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the
heavenly places, Far above all principality, and power, and might, and
dominion.” Based, therefore, on that position in Christ, we now the practice.
It is that same power that now enables the Christian to live in victory over “principalities,” “powers,” “the
rulers of the darkness of this world,” and “spiritual wickedness in high
places” (6:12).
What
better theme could be chosen to end this glorious Epistle? Oh, how we need it
today! Countless Christians are defeated on a daily basis by the world, the
flesh, and the Devil. What we so desperately need to realize is that any defeat
occurs because we allow it. God has already given us victory through the
victory of Christ; all we have to do is claim it.
Even more
basic to this subject, however, is that many Christians do not even know
they’re in a war at all. Christianity today is made to look easy, made to look
“user-friendly.” Quite frankly, many, if not most, Christians are clueless that
there is a violent war against spiritual enemies raging around them.
A vivid
illustration of this is in what was dubbed the “Phony War.” On September 3,
1939, two days after Germany invaded Poland, Britain and France declared war on
Germany. While fifty-six German divisions squashed Poland like a bug, however,
Britain and France did virtually nothing. In fact, while officially at war, for
eight months (late summer of 1939 to late spring 1940) neither country did much
at all. In spite of its great sea power, Britain sent only small overseas land
expeditions, and the French just sat comfortably underground along the Maginot
line. On May 10, 1940, however, the Western Front exploded in staggering
surprise, as Hitler attacked Holland, Belgium, and Luxembourg, his seventy-five
divisions slicing through the measly thirty-six divisions of the British,
French, and Belgian defenders like a hot knife through butter. On May 28, the
Belgians surrendered unconditionally, and by the 30th the entire British
Expeditionary Force of 338,226 men had its back to the English Channel at
Dunkirk. Had Hitler not made the inexplicable decision to stop his Panzer tanks
from advancing, most of that allied army would have been annihilated. As it
was, 68,111 British soldiers were killed. And all that was only the beginning
of the beginning. If the Allies had simply acted like they were actually in
war, Hitler could never have gotten as far as he did.
It is
vital, likewise, that Christians realize that they are in violent war, namely,
the war with Satan. And it is this war that Paul addresses in the this closing
section. This is why Paul uses the vivid militaristic imagery in this passage,
and why we’ll use several military illustrations as we continue. Because of the
militarism of the age in which Paul lived, it perfectly illustrated the
spiritual war of the Christian. While modern warfare is certainly terrible, war
in that day was truly “up close and personal.” While today we can kill the
enemy from miles away, or at least a few hundred yards, in that day most
killing was done with a sword and often involved hack away body parts. So Paul
was truly paralleling bloody, barbaric warfare with the spiritual war of the
Christian.
It’s
interesting to note that in the Roman era, military
effort was the most successful form of human activity. As not only a brilliant
commander but also a good historian, General George Patton reflected that Roman
ideal when he said, “Compared to war, all other forms of human endeavor shrink
to insignificance.”[1] While we might certainly disagree with that, it accurately
reflects the context of Paul’s statement. A century before, Rome had become the
mistress of the civilized world, not by commerce or diplomacy, but by the
sword. Paul’s metaphor, then, would immediately capture the attention of his
readers and would convey to them that they were in a no holds barred,
unrestrained, violent war.
Satan is
not a mischievous imp with horns who is dressed in a red suit and who carries a
pitch fork, as he is sometimes pictured. As we’ll see, Satan is evil itself; he
is the great adversary. Everything around us reflects the fact that all evil
flows from Satan. And our war against him is all out one, one that gives no
quarter, and takes no prisoners. We can’t afford to be “tolerant,” and we will
deal very specifically with who the enemy is and how to confront them. While
many might call this approach “divisive,” we can’t afford the luxury of such a
foolish attitude.
As our
outline indicates, this section can be divided into three emphases, which we
will address in this chapter and those that follow:
·
The War
We Wage
·
The Winning
That Results
·
The Weaponry
We Use
We shall
deal with the first emphasis in this chapter, which can also be divided into
three emphases: the foundation, fortification, and the foe.
Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.
As we are
going to study, we are involved in a war that is not physical, but spiritual.
Perhaps part of the reason some Christians don’t realize there is war on
because they don’t see any blood or don’t witness any bombs dropping. But Paul
would not have used this analogy if it wasn’t a “real war.” While we don’t see
“real blood,” we most certain see evidence of war in the form of broken homes,
shattered lives, carnal churches, and many other types of “spiritual mayhem”
everywhere we look. It is for this reason that we must wage the war under God’s
power and not our own.
First, notice the opening clause, Finally,
my brethren. In his mammoth eight-volume exposition of Ephesians, Martin
Lloyd-Jones’ sermons on verses 10-13 comprise their own 373-page book, which is
a wonderful aid to Christian living. Early in that volume he well says, “[Paul]
cannot stop at the end of the ninth verse . . . and for this reason, that we do
not live this Christian life in a vacuum.”[2] In other words, we cannot live the
Christian life in isolation; we are surrounded by sinful people, human
philosophy, false doctrine, and satanic activity. Paul couldn’t just in effect
say at the close of verse 9, “Well, there you have it. There’s how you are to
live. Now just go do it.” He knew that to say such a thing would result in
Christians being devoured. Instead, he outlines the war we face and the weapons
we are to use.
Tragically,
some Greek corrupt manuscripts omit the words my brethren, but the
majority of Greek manuscripts contain these words and thereby support the AV
reading. As Greek authority John Eadie puts it, this is “a reading of far
higher authority.”[3] This reading is better simply
because it personalizes Paul’s discussion. After all, he is about to deal with
one of the most personal subjects, if not the most personal subject, of his
entire letter.
This
clause could, therefore, be translated, “In conclusion, my brethren.”[4] He is saying in effect, “Well, my
brethren, there remains only one other thing to tell you, the most important
principle of all for victory in the Christian life.”
Second, then, what is that final principle Paul leaves with his readers? Here is the foundation of the whole passage: Be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might. The language used in this verse is both powerful and instructive. Be strong is endunamoō, the root of which is dunamis meaning “power.” As mentioned way back in 1:19, dunamis and its forms appear nine times in this Epistle and is where we derive English words such as “dynamic” and “dynamite.” Its basic meaning in the New Testament is “inherent ability, ability to perform anything.” We could also define the word as “that which overcomes resistance.” This dunamis can overcome any resistance, overcome any obstacle, perform any task.
Paul, therefore, says that our power is in the Lord. We are defeated in Christian living simply because we do not live by the power of the Lord. Since this entire passage is framed in a military context, these words in the Lord picture our Lord as our military commander. Leadership in any military setting is so obvious that it shouldn’t need mentioning, but it does nonetheless. There are many people in leadership today in churches that do not belong there; they are either not called to leadership or are not qualified to lead according to Biblical demands. Historically, so vitally is leadership that battles, campaigns, and entire wars have risen and fallen because of leadership.
The incompetence of Union generals early in the American Civil War, for example, is legendary. George McClellan is notable. While he was a first rate administrator and organizer, building the Army of the Potomac with strict discipline and drill, he was a deplorable commander. By January 1, 1862, he was still drilling his troops without going to battle. Lincoln, pressed McClellan often of when he would launch an offensive. Getting no answer, he commented to two other generals and some of his cabinet members in his characteristic manner, “I am in great distress. If something is not done soon, the bottom will be out of the whole affair, and if General McClellan does not want to use the army, I would like to borrow it.”
McClellan had two fatal faults. One was his swaggering arrogance. He would deliver ringing speeches to his men in true Napoleonic style, which actually earned him the nickname among his troops “The Little Napoleon.” His second fault was his refusal to move unless what he thought he needed had been provided. He constantly requested more men and had the incurable disease of believing that the enemy had more men than they actually had. This is vivid in one incident. In early April, after reaching Fort Monroe, Virginia, with 90,000 men McClellan said he was ready to move north on Yorktown where 15,000 Confederates were entrenched along the peninsula across from Yorktown. Two days later, however, he was easily tricked into believing that there were more Confederates than there were and simply laid siege to the city and requested more men. Had he not been such a fool, one push would have overwhelmed the enemy. Instead, he wasted a full month. Even worse was McClellan’s failure at Antietam to pursue and destroy the Confederate army in the fall of 1862, which would have ended the war right there.[5]
A study in contrasts was the leadership of British captains on warships in the eighteenth and ninetieth centuries. They routinely walked the decks of their ships defying enemy fire just to maintain the morale of their crews. This was, in fact, exactly how the famous Lord Nelson fell during the famous Battle of Trafalgar in 1805. His defeat of the French and Spanish fleets, however, ensured British naval supremacy for 100 years.[6]
While there are some valid criticisms of General George Patton, his brilliance cannot be argued, and he understood better than many the principle of leadership. Instead of giving orders from behind the lines, his men could see him on the battlefield. As military historian Steven Ambrose recounts, while they were compatible friends, the fundamental difference between Patton and General Dwight Eisenhower was that while “Ike” thought leadership was “just one factor,” Patton believed that “the chief ingredient in modern war was inspired leadership on the battlefield.”[7]
While someone might disagree with Patton when it comes to
physical warfare, the Christian had better agree with him in applying this to
spiritual warfare. Our leadership is the Lord Jesus, and His was truly
“inspired leadership on the battlefield.” He was “in all points tempted like as
we are, yet without sin” (Heb. 4:15). He wore the armor of God and wielded the
Sword of Spirit and thereby defeated not only the world, the flesh, and the
Devil, but also even death itself. If we go to war without that leadership, we
will surely fall and fall quickly.
There is
something else here. The most important thing about the expression be strong
in this context is that it appears in the Passive Voice, which means that the
subject is being acted upon (in contrast to the Active Voice which means the
subject is doing the action). Therefore, the translation be strong can
be misleading if we take it to mean self-effort. To reflect the Passive Voice,
therefore, the more literal translation would be, “Be empowered.” This shows
that an outside force gives us power. From whence does this come? Not from our
own knowledge or experience, but from the Lord. He is not only our Leader,
but also our Energy. If we go to battle in our own strength, we’ll not
only be defeated, we’ll be exhausted before the defeat. We’ll
simply get tired of trying. “It’s too hard to keep my defenses up,” we’ll
conclude. “It’s just to hard to dig in and stand against all the obstacles.” We
must, therefore, “Be empowered.”
Paul also
adds the clause, the power of His might. The word power here is kratos,
a fascinating word that speaks of natural strength and is usually used only of
God. It’s significant, indeed, that “the New Testament never says that humans
can either have or gain kratos.”[8] Man thinks he is strong; he thinks
he is the most powerful being on earth. But by nature man is actually quite
weak, having no natural strength whatsoever. It takes very specialized
training, for example, to learn how to survive in the wilderness. Also, the
training of military special forces groups is no less than astounding,
involving months of training to even qualify and then even more training for
each separate mission. Such training comes from true experts in each field. The
spiritual application is even more profound. Any strength, ability, talent, or
victory comes only from God’s gracious endowment.
Let us
also briefly note the word might. The Greek here (ischus) is an
even stronger than dunamis. In both Classical and New Testament Greek it
speaks of the inherent strength and power possessed by living beings, which
then gives them ability and might.
Putting it
all together, the full meaning and impact of Paul’s words is this:
My final challenge to you, my Brethren, is to be empowered
through your union with Christ, and then to draw all your strength from Him
alone, a strength that gives you power and ability.
The story
has been told several times that during the nineteenth century there was an
artist who also happened to be a good chess player. He painted a picture of a
chess game in progress. The players were a young man playing the white pieces
and Satan playing the black pieces. The stakes were the highest: if the young
man won he would be free from evil forever, but if Satan won the young man
would be his slave forever. Apparently the artist believed in the power of evil
over good, because his picture shows that Satan was the winner. The picture
showed that after moving his Queen Satan had announced a checkmate in four
moves. The young man’s hand hovers over his Rook and then stops. There was no
hope. The devil wins and the young man would be his slave forever. Several
chess masters had viewed the picture but to no avail. Then one day the great
New Orleans master Paul Morphy (1837-1884), however, came to view the picture. He studied the board for some
thirty minutes, lifting and lowing his hand to simulate various moves.
Suddenly, he shouted, “Young man, make that move. That’s the move!” To
everyone’s astonishment, he had discovered a combination the artist had not
considered. The young man defeated the devil.
That
vividly demonstrates that there is a way to defeat Satan. While we cannot do it
in our own strength and experience, no matter how good we think we are, the
only way is by the Real Master, the Lord Jesus Christ. Only He can show us the
Satan’s tactics and show us the right moves to make in response.
Puritan
William Gurnall’s, The Christian in Complete Armour, is a masterpiece of
almost 1,200 pages in two-column format and small print. Nothing has been
written that equals its exhaustiveness on this passage. The great divine and
author of “Amazing Grace,” John Newton, wrote, “If I might read only one book
beside the Bible, I would choose The Christian in Complete Armour.”
Similar praise has been heaped upon it by Charles Sturgeon, J. C. Ryle, and
others. Both the unabridged version and a modernized abridgment in three small
volumes thankfully remain in print from Banner of Truth Trust. Reminding us of
whose power we live by, he writes:
Remember, Christian, when thou hast thy best suit on, who made it, who paid for it. Thy grace, thy comfort is neither the work of thy own hands, nor the price of thy own desert; be not, for shame, proud of another’s cost. . . . Walk humbly therefore before thy God, and husband well that strength thou hast, remembering that it is borrowed strength. . . . A proud heart and a lofty mountain are never fruitful.[9]
Dear
Christian, failure in Christian living often comes because we actually try too
hard; we try within ourselves to succeed. At times this comes even by pride.
Verse 10 tells us that we must not try within ourselves, but must allow the
power of God to work. Without verse 10, in fact, the verses that follow are
meaningless. As Lord Nelson made famous the statement, “England expects every man to do his duty,” let every
Christian recognize their duty to be strong in the Lord.
This leads
us to the second emphasis.
Put on the whole armour of God,
We’re
going to examine the armour of God in great detail, so we only introduce
it here. As mentioned earlier, we are engaged in a spiritual war, a war we
cannot fight physically. God has, therefore, given us the weapons with which to
wage the war.
The words whole
armour are one word in the Greek, panoplian. The prefix pas
means “all or whole” and hoplon means “weapon.” Literally, then, the
word means “all the weapons” and pictures the full armor, both offensive and
defensive, of the heavily armed Roman soldier. We have all seen pictures or
movies depicting the Roman soldier, and that is the graphic and dramatic
picture Paul paints here.
Coupled with this are the words put on. This is the Greek enduō, which speaks of dressing oneself, but goes deeper. It’s a compound comprised of the prefix en (1722), “in,” and duō, “to sink, go in or under, to put on.” The complete idea in the word, however, going back as far as Homer, is not only the literal meaning of dressing oneself, but the figurative meaning of assuming qualities or virtues. Aristophanes, for example, said to “take courage,”[10] that is, to take on that quality of life.
This
is further demonstrated by several wonderful New Testament pictures. In our
Lord’s Parable of the Marriage Feast (Matt. 22:1-14), for example, one man was
not dressed in appropriate clothing for that occasion (“had not on,” v. 11),
showing a disregard for the requirements of attendance. This pictures the
person who professes to be a Christian but is not “dressed appropriately,” who
does not do what God requires.
The angels of Revelation 15:6 “are “clothed in pure and white linen,” indicating holiness. Likewise are the saints who accompany the conquering Christ at His Second “clothed in fine linen, white and clean” (19:14), for they shall reign with Him in holiness.
Paul apparently liked this word very much, since he uses it several times. He commands us, for example, to “put on the new man” in Ephesians 4:24 (Jan. 1). And what qualities are we putting on?—“righteousness and true holiness.”
Which brings us back to putting on God’s armor. As we’ve seen, each piece of armor is a specific quality that we must assume before we go into battle. Yes, we’re “getting dressed” to go to war, but we’re doing far more. We’re taking to ourselves qualities and characteristics that are now part of our very being, our very nature. We are, as Peter tells us, “partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust” (2 Pet. 1:4). When we “put on Christ” (Gal. 3:27), we do indeed assume His qualities. Let us live like it.
Put on is also in the Greek Aorist Tense,
showing a once-for-all act of putting on the armour and never taking it
off. Futher, the verb is also in the Imperative Mood showing a command with a
military snap. An expression among the infantry in more modern warfare is
“saddle up,” a command that means get all gear together and move out. Furhter
still, the verb is in the Middle Voice. In contrast to Active and Passive Voice
which we mentioned earlier, the Middle Voice means that the subject
participates in the results of the action or shares in the benefits of the
action. So, putting on the armour of God is greatly to our benefit.
Putting
all this together, God’s military command is that we put on all the armour,
and never take it off, so that we can not only survive, but be victorious in
battle. It’s not enough for a soldier to go into battle with the attitude that
he just wants to survive. This attitude, in fact, was one of the tragedies of
the Vietnam War; because of the deplorable morale of the soldiers brought on by
the turmoil and anti-war sentiments in America at that time, many of the
soldiers fought only for their personal survival; no longer was their goal
victory. Now, we in no way criticize those men. On the contrary, we criticize
those in America who turned their backs on those brave men. The attitude in war
must be victory. How true is the statement made famous by General Douglas MacArthur,
“In war there can be no substitute for victory.” The spiritual application is
vivid: we are not fighting to survive but to win! Our objective is not just to
come out unscathed but to inflict casualties on the enemy, Satan and his
servants. General George Patton said it well, “No [one] ever won a war by dying
for his country; he won it by making the other poor [soul] die for his
country.”
While such
sentiment might seem barbaric and sad, it must be the attitude of the Christian
in the spiritual war they face. The only way we can be victorious is to put on
all the weapons and leave them on for the duration of the conflict, a conflict
that will continue for each of us until we go home to be the Lord. This brings
us to the third emphasis.
that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
How often
have w read those verses and not stopped to really understand the implication
of them. Dear Christian Friend, I pray that what follows will be of help to you
and that you will realize, perhaps better than you ever have before in your
Christian life, who the enemy is. You face an enemy who is out to destroy you
and anything that has to do with the one True God, and who will use any means
whatsoever to accomplish that objective.
An
important observation serves to introduce the foe that Paul describes here. Up
to now, he has been dealing with the enemy within us, that is, our own
flesh. He has challenged us in several ways to walk correctly in the Christian
life, and everyone of those ways demands a victory over inward impulse.
Now, however, he speaks of the enemy without, the enemy who is outside
of us, the enemy who surrounds us and threatens to destroy us by violent
onslaught. Let us, therefore, consider two things.
Once
again, we see that the war in which we are engaged is not physical, not flesh
and blood. And may we emphasize the fact again that we are engaged in a literal
war. We’re not engaged in a “police action,” as the Korean War was ridiculously
dubbed by Harry Truman; neither are we involved in a minor skirmish, or border
dispute, or any such thing. We are engaged in an all-out war to the death.
Ponder three principles about this war. The Devil has declared war on us, and
we must do the same, just as America was forced to do against the Axis nations
in world War II.
This war
is one that is sharp, severe, and savage. This fact is made plain by the Greek
word translated wrestle. It is the word palē which is used only here in the New
Testament. One Greek authority tells us that this word refers to “a contest
between two in which each endeavors to throw the other, and which is decided
when the victor is able [to] hold [his opponent down] with his hand upon his
neck.”[11] Paul writes something very similar
to Timothy, “Fight the good fight of faith” (I Tim. 6:12). Timothy immediately understood that
Paul was saying that spiritual warfare is savage. History tells us why.
Both
ancient boxing and wrestling were savage. In boxing matches, the “Greeks fought
almost to the death with gloves reinforced at the knuckles with an iron band
three quarters of an inch thick.” The head was the only target, and “there was
no rule against hitting a man who was down.” There were no rest periods or
rounds. The fight continued until one surrendered or was incapacitated. As the
brutality increased in Greek times, wrestling and boxing were combined into a
new contest, the pankration (literally, “game of all powers”). Anything
except eye gouging or biting was permitting, even kicking the stomach. Some
famous competitors won by breaking the opponent’s fingers. One was noted for
striking so viciously “with straightened fingers and strong sharp nails that he
pierced the flesh of his adversary and dragged out his bowels.”[12]
That is
why Paul says that we are at war! As graphic and barbaric as the ancient pankration was,
he says that we wrestle against an ever greater spiritual foe. Are we
getting the picture? Paul mentions this again in his last letter, saying of
himself, “I have fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept
the faith” (II Tim. 4:7). This war is, indeed, “for keeps.”
In light
of the ancient pictures, this is solo combat. It is close, hand-to-hand
grappling with the enemy. In our day weapons are designed to kill from miles
away. An ICBM is, of course, intercontinental. The weapons system of my
favorite airplane, the amazing F-14 Tomcat, has the ability to track more than
twenty air targets over 100 miles away, pick out six of them, and them destroy
them with its six Phoenix missiles. Even on the infantry level, using a
specially telescoped .50-caliber machine gun converted to single shot
operation, the legendary
Marine sniper Carlos Hathcock killed a Viet Cong soldier who was transporting
weapons along the Ho Chi Minh trail at the unbelievable distance of 2,000
yards, well over one mile.
In spite
of such long distance warfare, however, soldiers today are still taught close
combat tactics. Why? Because when war gets “personal,” they better know how to
fight and kill the enemy quickly. Likewise, the Christian cannot rely on
technology to win the battle. There are no jet aircraft, no “smart bombs,” no
sniper rifles. There’s only one weapon: “the Sword of the Spirit, which is the
Word of God,” a very personal weapon. And every Christian had better know how
to use It.
There’s no
discharge from this war. You can’t enlist for a two-year hitch. Never can you
say, as the expression goes in the military, “I’m short,” meaning your
discharge is only a few days or hours away. Every Christian is in this war for
life.
In The
Christian in Complete Armour, William Gurnall writes here on the permanence
of the Christian’s warfare:
The Christian life is a continual wrestling. He is, as Jeremiah said of himself, born “a man of strife” [15:10]. Or what the prophet [said] to Asa, may be said to every Christian; “From hence thou shalt have wars” [II Chron. 16:9]: from thy spiritual birth to thy natural death; from the hour when thou first didst set thy face to heaven, till thou shalt set thy foot in heaven. Israel’s march out of Egypt was, in gospel-sense, our taking the field against sin and Satan; and when had they peace?—not till they lodge their colours in Canaan.[13]
So, when
Paul used palē (wrestle) the Ephesian
believers immediately knew what he was talking about; they immediately realized
how severe the struggle is and that it would continue until they lodged their
colors in Heaven. Again, sadly, many Christians don’t even know that they are in
a war much less that the war is brutal. This war involves many things,
including: spiritual apathy, unholy living, doctrinal error, and much more.
While Paul also wrote to Timothy, “All that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer
persecution” (II Tim. 3:12), it’s very hard to tell nowadays just how any
Christians are suffering in the war. We have become so fashionable, so
tolerant, so all-embracing, that we’re not fighting against anything. Most of
us reflect the words of hymn writer Isaac Watts (1674-1748) in the second
stanza of his challenging hymn, Am I a Solider of the Cross?:
Am I a soldier of the cross,
A follower of the Lamb,
And shall I fear to own His cause,
Or blush to speak His Name?
Must I be carried to the skies
On flowery beds of ease,
While others fought to win the prize,
And sailed through bloody seas?
Are there no foes for me to face?
Must I not stem the flood?
Is this vile world a friend to grace,
To help me on to God?
Sure I must fight if I would reign;
Increase my courage, Lord.
I’ll bear the toil, endure the pain,
Supported by Thy Word.
Thy saints in all this glorious war
Shall conquer, though they die;
They see the triumph from afar,
By faith’s discerning eye
When that illustrious day shall rise,
And all Thy armies shine
In robes of victory through the skies,
The glory shall be Thine.
Oh, that
we would recognize the enemy! The Devil (Satan) is evil personified. He
is a roaring lion who walks around seeking whom he can devour (I Pet. 5:8). He
never gives men anything that is good for them; his only desire is to destroy
men. May we each fully grasp the fact of just how severe this spiritual war is.
To lose the war does not mean that we just receive a wound and a “Purple
Heart,” rather it means a ruined life, a shattered family, and a broken nation.
Martyn
Lloyd-Jones provides a challenging contrast. He writes that some teachers say
to Christians, “You are spiritually ill and spiritually wounded and spiritually
defeated. There is a clinic for you and there is a message that will sooth you
and help to heal your wounds, and lead you to a way of victory without
struggle.” We hear such drivel today as some teachers speak of the ease of
being a Christian and how it will cancel out problems. But as Lloyd-Jones goes
on to say, “A clinic! But there is no clinic; it is rather a barracks!”[14] While we all have been “drafted”
into this war, may we all be challenged to willingly enlist and be committed to
the task of winning.
William
Gurnall adds an even more sobering comment concerning the fact that this
spiritual war reveals that some professing Christians are not Christians at
all:
This gives us then a reason why there are so many professors and so few Christians indeed; so many that run and so few obtain; so many to into the field against Satan and so few come out conquerors; because all have a desire to be happy, but few have courage and resolution to grapple with the difficulties that meet them in the way to happiness. All Israel came joyfully out of Egypt under Moses’ conduct, yea, and a mixed multitude with them , but when their bellies were a little pinched with hunger, and their greedy desires of a present Canaan deferred, yea, instead of peace and plenty, war and penury, they like white-livered soldiers, are ready to fly from their colours.[15]
This
challenges each of us first to “examine [ourselves], whether [we] be in the
faith” (II Cor. 13:5) and to “make [our] calling and election sure” (II Pet.
1:10). It then challenges the true believer to recognize the war he or she is
in and prepare for battle.
There
truly are countless religious leaders and whole denominations who, right along
with the world, reject any concept of a literal, personal Devil or
demon. They call such belief silly superstition that comes from the Middle
Ages, when people believed demons hid behind trees. But at the same time
neither can such critics adequately explain the evil that permeates our world.
There’s simply too much evil to account for by just criminals and “mean”
people.
It is
absolutely necessary for a soldier to know who his enemy is. There are many
examples of this in history, such as how General Patton read Rommel’s famous
book on tank warfare. One of my favorite examples is Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto,
the commander of the Japanese Combined Fleet in World War II. Having earned a
degree at Harvard and later becoming military attaché in Washington during a
fifteen year stay, Yamamoto knew American thinking very well. He had also seen
the virtually unlimited industrial power of America, and it was for that reason
that he was flatly opposed to war with America. When war came, however, he had
no choice; the traditions of Bushido and duty to Emperor and country
bound him. But once again, his knowledge of the enemy told him that there was
absolutely no hope whatsoever of victory unless the American fleet at Pearl
Harbor could be destroyed in a surprise attack. The real disaster to Japan was
that while their ultimatum and declaration of war was supposed to be delivered
before the attack began, that message was delayed so the attack came while the
nations were technically at peace. Yamamoto did not know that, and his
knowledge of American thinking is best seen in these words he “reportedly”
said: “I cannot think of anything that would enrage the Americans more. I
fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a
terrible resolve.”[16]
Likewise,
we had better understand our enemy, how he thinks and fights, or we will be
defeated. Let us, therefore, examine our enemy: Satan and his demons.
. . . the wiles of the devil.
In this
great letter, Paul makes it clear to every Christian who the main enemy is,
namely Satan. To understand our enemy, let us divide our examination
into three emphases.
Originally,
Satan (which literally means “adversary”) was Lucifer, “the shining one.” He
once was the anointed cherub, the chief of all God’s angels. But he rebelled
against God and tried to raise himself above God (Is. 14:12-17; Ez. 28:12-19:
Rev. 12:7-9). As a result, he and one third of all the angels, those which
followed him (Rev. 12:4), were cast out of Heaven.
There’s
little need to go into great detail about Satan, as some teachers do, because
Satan’s titles actually describe his character; truly, these titles say it all!
First, “Prince of the Power of the Air”
(Eph. 2:2). We studied this title in our exposition of Ephesians 2:2. Briefly,
“prince” is archon which speaks of a ruler, commander, or chief. It
comes from the verb archo meaning “to be first.” “Power” is exousia
meaning “authority.” “Air” is aer, which refers to the lower, more
dense, and more impure atmosphere. It is to be distinguished from aither
(English “ether”) which refers to the purer air of the upper atmosphere. The
Greeks viewed this lower atmosphere (aer) as the home of the spirits.[17] Satan, then, is clearly “the first
authority of all the demon world.” Earth is his domain; he and his demons prey
on humanity and humanity is dominated by his power.
Puritan
Thomas Manton comments on this title: “The devil is called ‘prince of the power
of the air.’ Infected air is drawn into the lungs without pain, and we get a
disease before we feel it.”[18] Indeed, that spiritual image shoes
how Satan has polluted the air! All we have to is “breath” to be infected by
the world. It is vital, therefore, that we inoculate ourselves from such
airborne disease.
Second, “The God of This World” (II Cor.
4:4). Most people today would never consider themselves “Satan-worshippers.”
Satan worship is equated with those certain people who practice animal
sacrifice and black magic within the confines of darkened, candle-lit rooms.
But let it be clear that whatever is not of God is of Satan, and all men
worship Satan if they reject God. Why? Because all men are of their father the
devil (Jn. 8:44); they give homage to him with their Humanism, and even their
religions, because it is all self-centered, and “self-centeredness,” like all
sin, originated with Satan.
Third, “The Ruler of This World” (Jn.
16:11). Satan is the true “world ruler.” Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, Napoleon,
Alexander, and other such men were not leaders at all. Every one of them was
merely a puppet of Satan! The same is true of communists as well as all
political and religious liberals today. Why? Because any such humanistic
philosophy originates with Satan. Even political philosophy that is not based
on a Christian foundation is of Satan.
Fourth, “The Wicked One” (Matt. 13:19).
This title not only reveals that he is wicked in himself, but that he is
actually the source of all wickedness. There is in Satan not one shred, not one
minute particle of good. He is lying, he is stealing, he is
murder, he is fornication, he is homosexuality, and he is
all other sin.
Fifth, The Devil (v. 11; Jn.
8:44; etc). This title is used some thirty-three times in the New Testament and
literally means “accuser or slanderer.” Because it is used so many times, we
must conclude that one of his chief activities is slander and accusation. He
slanders God to men (Gen. 3:1-7) and men to God (Job 1:9; 2:4).
Never has
western civilization been more anti-God than today. God is denied and slandered
in every way possible. Who is behind this? SATAN! On the other hand, how
foolish men are for following Satan in this practice because Satan turns right
around and tries to destroy men. He will do anything to men that he can do if
it will destroy them. He knows his fate, which is the eternal flame of the Lake
of Fire (Rev. 20:10), and he is trying to take as many with him as he can (Rev.
20:15). This leads to another characteristic.
Sixth, “The Tempter” (Matt. 4:3). Satan
continually solicits men and women to sin. This fact is vividly illustrated in
the temptation of Eve (Gen. 3:1-6) and the temptation of Christ (Matt. 4:1-11).
Why does he do this? Because he hates God and he hates men. Dear Christian,
since Satan is, as we saw earlier, lying, stealing, murder, fornication,
homosexuality, and all other sin, he is, therefore, trying to lure men into it
all. And may we observe, as we look at our world today, he’s having great
success.
Seventh, “An Angel of Light” (II Cor.
11:13-14). As we’ll see in a moment, one of the tactics of Satan is deception,
so much so that the term Angel of Light is ascribed to him. He and much of what
he does looks like light. He is the
master of making anything he wants look good, right, and enlightened, but in
the end it is only darkness and death.
It is
essential that we recognize Satan’s tactics. Sadly, it is also necessary
that we get specific. After many years of ministry I have discovered
that if we don’t get specific, many folks just don’t “get it.” As mentioned
back in 4:14, we have become so undiscerning that we will accept virtually
anyone who claims to be of God, regardless of what he or she teaches or
practices. It has come to the place where many Christians cannot see error even
when it is right in front of them. Paul had to get very specific, sometimes
even naming names, and we must do the same.
We should
take careful note of the word wiles. We first saw this word, the Greek methodeia
(English, “method”), back in 4:14 where it is translated “lie in wait”: “That
we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with
every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby
they lie in wait to deceive.” These two occurrences of this word are, in fact,
the only occurrences in the New Testament, where it means “to investigate by
settled plan” or “a deliberate planning or system.” [19] As we saw in 4:14, there are countless
teachers who deliberately and systematically formulate false doctrine which
perverts the Word of God and deceives unsuspecting people. Mark it down,
apostasy is planned, deliberate, and systemized. We now see why that is true;
it is true because of Satan. He, too, is deliberate; he, too, has a system and
plan. So, we could translate this word as “methods,” “schemes,” or “tactics.”
What,
then, are the schemes of Satan? Well, the grand strategy of his campaign is to
undermine God and His Word and to take as many people to hell with him as he
can. But to do that, he uses tactics, just as groups of soldiers use tactics to
win battles, which in turn helps achieve the objective of the grand strategy of
the army. Let us, therefore, take some time to consider the major tactics of
Satan.
As we
examine these, we’ll also take an overview of the amour of God. Of course,
we’ll closely examine each piece of amour later in our study, but this overview
will show that each of Satan’s tactics can be defeated by one of the pieces of
God’s amour.
First, Satan uses Deception. Here is by far the greatest tool of Satan, which is why we will spend the most time on this point. As we saw above, the Greek behind wiles clearly shows the idea of deceit. There is no better commentary on this principle that James 1:14: “But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.” The Greek behind “drawn away” is exelkō. The root helkō, which basically means is “to draw,” “tug,” or, in the case of persons, “compel.” Jesus uses this word, for example, of irresistibly drawing souls to Himself (Jn. 6:44; 12:32).[20] The prefix ek, however, means out or away, so the picture here is the drawing, tugging, or compelling someone away from that which is good.
Even more graphic is the word “enticed,” which is deleazō,
to bait or entrap and pictures the idea of baiting a hook. A fisherman or
trapper uses an enticing bait to draw his prey. During World War II both German
and Japanese troops would booby trap souvenirs, such as pistols and Samurai
swords. The Viet Cong did the same in Vietnam. Americans returned the favor,
however; since the VC loved to scrounge US supplies, when GIs vacated a
campsite, they often left C-rations behind wired to a claymore mine.
All that
pictures Satan and his deceptions. He always draws us by using a bait that
looks desirable and even profitable; he makes it look like it will help
you and be useful. But just as the fisherman, trapper, and solder hides the
consequences of taking the bait, so does Satan. He tries to hide what sin will
do. He camouflages the trap so well that only by stopping and carefully
examining the situation can we see the trip wire. Vance Havner writes:
Satan is the Master Deceiver, the Mock angel disguised as an angel of light. He does not plow up the wheat in our Lord’s parable, he plants tares that resemble wheat so closely that few know the difference and final separation is left to angels. When Moses performs miracles, Jannes and Jambres are on hand to match the performance. Our Saviour repeatedly warned against deceivers in the last days.[21]
Oh, how
many Satanic deceptions there are today! They are everywhere!
1. There
are several of what we could call “Societal Snares.” One such snare is “Women’s
Liberation,” which supposedly reflects an “enlightened society.” But this is
simply Satanic deception that has resulted in the decay of the family and total
obliteration of roles and biblical standards of the home. Another is the snare
of the “new morality,” which is in reality NO morality, and which has brought
about rampant promiscuity, abortion, birth control, and many other
consequences. We should, in fact, call the proponents of such things exactly
what they are, namely, tools of Satan. Still another is the hellish snare of
homosexuality, which lures people because of the desire for unrestrained
pleasure. The consequences have been a further destruction of family values, an
AIDS epidemic, and life spans statistically proven to be shorter. Yes, Satan
always hides the consequences of taking the bait.
2. There
are also what we might call “Truth Traps,” things that look true but are false.
Let’s examine four of the most prominent.
(a) For
decades people have been lured into cults, for example, which is one of
the greatest examples of Satanic deception. But what exactly is a cult? In his
book, The Rise of the Cults (p. 12), Walter Martin offers this good
definition:
A cult, then, is a group of people polarized around someone’s interpretation of the Bible and is characterized by major deviations from orthodox Christianity relative to the cardinal doctrines of the Christian faith, particularly the fact that God became man in Jesus Christ.
The growth
of cults over time is positively staggering. Mormonism, for example, has grown
from thirty members at its beginning in 1830 to its claim of 8,000,000 today.
But why do people flock to cults? Several reasons have been offered by various
teachers that can really be summed up by three.[22]
(1) Cults
appeal to basic human needs. Every person has the needs of being loved and
accepted, but people with emotional and identity problems are particularly
susceptible to cults. They seem to answer those big questions (Who am I? Why am
I here? Where am I going?) and offer a sheltered (sometimes even cloistered)
atmosphere that makes a person feel protected. Tragically, in fact, they
sometimes actually appeal more loving than true Christians and cult teachers
make more of a more favorable
impression than true Christian leaders.
(2) Cults
appear to be Christian. Being a Christian is fashionable to many people. After
all, they want to believe in Jesus and His moral teachings. A cult, however,
denies and twists certain teachings to make the system more pleasing to men’s
ideas and philosophies. The most basic example is salvation by works, which
every cult and false religion in the world teaches. By nature man wants to be
able to earn his salvation and every single cult, without exception, feeds that
desire.
(3) Cults
promise great blessings. A cult offers pat answers and “secret truths” that
only it can provide and then promises great blessings, such as prosperity and
“inner peace,” if one obeys its teachings. They invariably promise instant
cures to one’s problems. To this mentality, “traditional” Christianity is too
slow, too unexciting, and too uneventful.
One writer
offers several characteristics of a cult that make it easy for the discerning
Christian to spot a mile away:
·
A
Non-Biblical Source of Authority
·
Revelations
of New Truth and New Interpretations of Scripture
·
The
Perversion of the Person and Work of Christ
·
Unbiblical
teaching on the Nature of God, such as the denial of the Trinity
·
Salvation
By Works
·
False
Prophecy[23]
Cults are,
indeed, a subtle and extremely effective way to draw people away from the
Truth. I have seen professed Christians leave a fundamental, evangelical church
and join a cult, such as Mormonism or Jehovah’s Witness. The discerning
Christian will always beware of such deception.
(b)
Another “Truth Trap” of satanic deception is heresy within the Church. A
contrast that many Christians do not understand is the difference between apostasy
and heresy. While there is a fine line, there is distinction. Apostasy,
which we just illustrated through cults, is a departure from Christian Truth in
general; it is professed Christianity but a denial of it basic truths. This might consist of all
Christian Truth or just a single Truth (such as the Deity of Christ or
salvation by grace) that is so pivotal that it results in the destruction of
all biblical Truth. An apostate is not a Christian. One historical
example was Arius, a 4th Century parish priest in Alexandria
who taught that Jesus was not coequal with God and was, in fact, a created
being. Arianism has existed in various forms ever since.
Heresy,
however, is not as broad and can be committed by a true Christian. Heresy is
when, while holding to the foundational doctrines of Scripture, one deviates on
a particular doctrine. One example of this would be the use images in Church
History. While any use whatsoever of images was NEVER used by the Early
Church because God forbid it, they slowly came into use through emblems
such as the dove, fish, anchor, vine, and lamb. Gradually this increased
through paintings, sculptures, and jewelry that depicted Biblical events,
items, saints, and martyrs. While some folks get upset by such an observation,
such practices today of hanging pictures of Jesus on the wall, plastering
Christian symbols on our cars, and wearing jewelry with religious symbols is
actually heresy. It violates a very specific command of God to make no
images (Ex. 20:3-5). Today, however, many Christians think such things are
“good” and “profitable,” but that is the trap.
There are
many such examples. The so-called “Christian Crusades” were based on the
heretical teaching that Christians can use force against unbelievers. There’s
also the heretical teaching that God demands poverty from Christians. This was
the teaching of the Waldensians of the 12th Century, some of whom
even taught living only by alms. The very opposite of that is the heresy of
“prosperity teachers,” who tell us that if we give to God, He’ll return
our “investment” and make us rich. The latest version of this is the almost
cultish book The Prayer of Jabez. The basic, underlying teaching of the
book is that the repetition of this obscure prayer unlocks the power of God in
our lives, and that, quite frankly, is heresy. Why? Because it is a departure
from the clear teaching of Scripture. The “seeker-sensitive” movement in Church
ministry today that appeals to people’s “felt-needs” to lure them into the
church is heresy plain and simple because it does not conform to New Testament
precedent of Church ministry; nowhere does the New Testament teach that
approach. The whole spirit of “tolerance” in the Church today is also
heretical, because God commands that we discern Truth from error and strongly
condemn false teaching in no uncertain terms (see our exposition of 4:14).
Such
alterations to biblical Truth are everywhere. Why? Because they work great!
Satan lures people away from the Truth in the subtlest of ways. And while
people’s motives are as pure as the driven snow, what they are doing is still
heresy. And the result that is hidden by the snare is the perversion of the
Gospel and other biblical Truth.
(c)
Another “Truth Trap” of satanic deception is human philosophy. This
takes many forms, such as Humanism, Relativism, Rationalism, and Evolution. Evolution
is especially satanic and particularly deceptive. Based solely on the idea that
given enough time matter created itself, and without a single shred of
empirical evidence, Satan has deceived millions using a cadre of so-called
“scientists” who hate God. We say “so-called” because Evolution is not
science; it is religion. True science is provable and demonstrable, while
religion is a belief, and a belief is all Evolution is.
There is
also the deception of Humanism. As mentioned in our study of parenting,
man being “the measure of all things” goes back to Protagoras in 5th
Century BC Athens and was from then on interwoven into Greek thought. Coupled
with this is Relativism, the idea that truth varies with
individuals and circumstance. Both of these deceive man into believing in his own
self-sufficiency—that’s the trap. And the hidden result is that he is lead
further and further from the truth of Jesus Christ. Because he has been blinded
by Satan (II Cor. 4:4), and his “conscience [has been] seared with a hot iron”
(I Tim. 4:2) so he can’t even feel the loss.
There is
also the deception of Rationalism, the philosophic doctrine that all knowledge is gained through reason and
logic. It is this
philosophy, in fact, that has leveled more Stannic attacks against God and the
Bible than any thing else. “Higher Criticism” questions and denies the
historical accuracy of the Bible and miracles, and has been practiced by
inarguably unsaved critics.
Another
aspect of this that burdens me every day, however, is that the vast majority of
evangelicals refuse to acknowledge that they, too, have been lured into the
trap of Rationalism by “Lower Criticism,” that is, the so-called science of naturalistic textual study. Instead
of recognizing the biblical principle that God alone has providentially
preserved the true text of Scripture in the majority of Greek manuscripts, they
have been lured into the intellectual trap of the rationalist who says, “We
must treat the text of the Bible like any other literature and must use
rationalistic methods to restore the original text.” What are the results?
Since the process is ongoing, we neither have the original text nor can
we ever have the original text. A new Greek text comes out periodically
(as of this date, the Nestle-Aland text is in its 26th Edition), and
we are drowning in a sea of modern translations that often contradict one
another and cheapen the Bible to being just another bestseller. Why can’t we
just stop for one moment and say, “Wait! What is the basis of this process? Is
the process based upon the sovereignty of God in preserving the text or upon
rationalism?”
(d) One other “Truth Trap” of satanic deception is mysticism, which seeks Truth through feelings, imagination, personal visions, inner voices, private illumination, and other subjective urges. Mysticism is rampant in Christianity today. At the very heart of Mysticism is “Contemplative Prayer,” which is nothing like the prayer described in Scripture. In this kind of prayer, one must become detached from what is going on around him, sit in contemplative silence, empty his mind, and become one with God. It is then, through imaginative experiences with Christ that He becomes the source of our words and actions.
The bait
in this trap looks wonderful and even looks godly. But the consequences of
following subjective visions, voices, and revelations instead of
Scripture alone is catastrophic. Anyone can believe and teach anything he or
she wishes with no controls. This has lead to unlimited tolerance, Relativism,
and even ecumenism. Mysticism ultimately makes a mockery of Scripture, and
Satan is delighted. Worse, “emptying the mind” means it can then be filled with
anything, from subtle deviations from Scripture to full blown Satanic delusion
and even influence.
How,
then, do we combat Satan’s deceptions? The weapons we use against this tactic are the Girdle of Truth
and The Sword of the Spirit. As we will study, the word “truth” (alētheia) has two meanings. One meaning is objective
truth that is found in God’s Word (which we also studied in depth in 1:14),
coupled with the offensive nature of The Sword of the Spirit. The other meaning
is subjective truth, that is, our own truthfulness and integrity. Well,
it is the objective, authoritative Truth of God’s Word that combats Satan’s
deceptions.
Second, Satan uses Doubt. Oh, how Satan uses doubt! The greatest doubt Satan plants in our minds is a lack of assurance of our salvation. If he can makes us doubt that, he’s got us! But Paul dealt with this doctrinal reality early in this letter. In 1:13, he writes that we have been “sealed with that Holy Spirit of promise.” One of the pictures of the ancient custom of sealing was assurance, illustrated by the seal on Jesus tomb (Matt. 27:62‑66), which assured that no one would touch that tomb. He, therefore, assures us that we are sealed eternally (once-for-all) in Christ by the Holy Spirit’s sealing.
But Satan
also tempts us to doubt God’s provision, God’s methods for ministry, our own
qualification and effectiveness in ministry, and everything else of importance.
Why? Because once we begin to doubt, we are on the slippery downhill
slide to defeat.
What’s the
weapon? The Shield of Faith. The only way to deflect and extinguish the
doubts that Satan hurls at us is by trusting God and His Word and leaning only
upon Him.
Third, Satan uses Discouragement.
Satan will throw disappointments, disasters, and delays at us until we just
feel like quitting. Military history tells us that battles (even wars) have
been lost because of the low morale of the troops, even when there was military
superiority. Vietnam is a classic example. Low morale, brought on by government
corruption and public criticism of the soldiers, contributed to American
failure, in spite of far greater military strength and technology. A good
commander, then, knows that morale is a vital factor and he tries always to
keep up the spirits of each soldier under his command. As we mentioned earlier,
a soldier must not go to war with just the attitude of survival, but with the
attitude of victory.
Paul also
dealt with this principle earlier in the letter. In 3:13 he wrote, “Faint
not,” which is ekkakeō, “to turn out to be a
coward, to lose one’s courage, to faint or despond in view of trial,”[24]
or even stronger, “to be utterly spiritless.”[25] This
challenges us not to sink into despondency, not to become so dispirited and
cowardly that they just quit.
How does
God keep up our morale? With The Helmet of Salvation. The head is the
most vital area of the human body for it contains the brain. So then, the
Helmet of Salvation protects the Christian’s mind, his thinking, his attitudes,
and his emotions. Discouragement comes from emotion, so victory over it comes
from the intellect; it is with the intellect that we know God is on the throne
and in control. To be discouraged, Dear Christian Friend, is to disbelieve God.
Fourth, Satan uses Distraction.
The chief agent in driving us to distraction is temptation to sin. As mentioned
earlier, one of Satan’s names is “The Tempter” (Matt. 4:3). Both Eve (Gen.
3:1-6) and our Lord (Matt. 4:1-11) were tempted to sin in all three areas of
sin: “the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life”
(I Jn. 2:16). We, too, will be tempted in these areas. “Lust” (epithumia) refers to a
strong craving, or passionate desire, whether good or evil; the context here,
of course, speaks of evil cravings.
“The
flesh,” then, refers to craving something that appeals to our fallen nature,
bodily appetites that are out of control. Hunger is not evil, but
gluttony is sinful. Thirst is not sin, but drunkenness is. Sleep isn’t sinful,
but laziness is. Sex is not sinful, but fornication is.
“The eyes” refers to ev